A psychoanalysis on a psychoanalysis

I did a psychoanalysis on my friend for fun. I like wrote her an essay, and had her read it. I will now be performing a reverse psychoanalysis. Through analyzing what I based my analysis on her on, I can figure out what things are important to me in a person, and what my logic is.

1. We shouldn't be cringing at Matt Walsh if the things that he was doing in his two movies aren't things we shouldn't be allowed to do in day-to-day life. He said and did nothing wrong. Therefore why cringe, if his "making uncomfortable" of people wasn't actually making people uncomfortable, since they never caught on? If they didn't even cringe, why should we? So the fact that we're supposed to cringe playing it back (watching the movie) makes no sense to me. And even if they did catch on, why should we, or everyone, cringe if those actions aren't actions that we aren't/shouldn't be able to do in day-to-day life. He did it, with no hurdles, basically, so why can't/shouldn't we? We're able to.

   1. And when I think about the type of people who do cringe at Matt Walsh, it makes me think there's a certain fakeness to them, because they can't handle even a little bit of discomfort. Even the people in the movie, who were being Matt Walshed, didn't cringe. Again, why should we?

   2. Do we have to be fake with people, is that what it is? Fake nice? We can't be real?

2. I feel like I truly believe and cannot seem to change my mind about my opinion that if you just do some research on religions or a particular religion, if you're agnostic or curious, you will start believing; you will convert.

3. Being Christian: choice or chance? This will be another blog post...